Auteur/autrice : Dan Candido

Low-code platforms are increasingly marketed as “AI-built,” promising applications generated automatically from prompts or forms. That promise sounds efficient, but in enterprise and regulated environments, it is deeply misleading. The real future of low-code is not auto-generation; it is AI-assisted design that preserves governance, intent, and accountability. AI-Assisted Low-Code Is Being Framed the Wrong Way […]

Collaboration is often treated as a cultural challenge, but most collaboration failures are structural. Without clear process governance, even the best collaboration tools amplify confusion instead of coordination. As organizations scale, governance becomes the difference between shared ownership and shared risk. Collaboration Is Not a Tooling Problem   When organizations talk about collaboration, the conversation […]

Most digital transformation programs fail because they optimize after deployment.Business process simulation changes that by allowing organizations to test scenarios, predict outcomes, and expose bottlenecks before decisions become expensive mistakes. Digital transformation without foresight is still guesswork   Most digital transformation programs promise efficiency, agility, and resilience. In practice, many stall after documenting processes or […]

Manual root cause analysis breaks down at scale. CAPA fatigue is a signal that quality systems need deeper process intelligence, not more paperwork. Corrective and Preventive Action was never meant to be exhausting. In theory, CAPA exists to close the loop between issues and improvement. In practice, for many organizations, it has become a grinding […]

AI cannot reason across silos. When QMS and BPM operate in isolation, intelligence stops at the system boundary. For more than two decades, organizations have invested heavily in standalone Quality Management Systems (QMS) and Business Process Management (BPM) tools. These platforms promised control, standardization, and visibility. And for a long time, they delivered just enough […]

Process visibility alone does not satisfy modern compliance. Without risk, controls, and regulatory traceability connected to processes, organizations are exposed. For years, Business Process Management (BPM) has been the backbone of operational improvement.   Organizations invested heavily in modeling workflows, optimizing efficiency, and documenting how work gets done. And for good reason. BPM brings structure, […]

Fragmented QMS, BPM, and GRC tools are creating visibility gaps that modern compliance models can no longer afford. Compliance has outgrown the systems traditionally used to manage it. For years, organizations have relied on separate tools to manage quality, processes, risk, governance, and documentation. Each system served a purpose, but together they created operational silos […]

The rise of ungoverned AI use is introducing traceability gaps across regulated processes, signaling the next major challenge for compliance and audit readiness. Organizations have always feared what they can’t see. For decades, compliance teams built entire systems around visibility: documented processes, controlled procedures, structured approvals, traceable decisions. The goal was simple. If something ever […]

A unified European framework transforming how financial institutions govern ICT risk, operational resilience, and third-party oversight. Understanding DORA in Practical Terms   The Digital Operational Resilience Act represents one of the EU’s most ambitious attempts to modernize financial-sector governance. Rather than layering yet another set of cybersecurity rules on top of existing frameworks, DORA consolidates […]